Abolishing performance ratings not without risk

Published on

Here's some interesting research insight into the perils of abandoning performance ratings.

The thinking tends to be that imposing performance ratings will be counterproductive, reinforce stereotypes, encourage the idea that managers only have to have performance conversations once a year and that the annual performance appraisal system is so time consuming. The obvious answer, abandon it. Hmmm, seems that may not be the answer. Too often, and perhaps not surprisingly, the result is that, instead of encouraging a continuing discussion about performance, no discussion takes place at all or, if it does, the employee does not understand what s/he is being told.

Sadly, the report concludes, most managers are not skilled enough to deliver clear, meaningful messages, without some structure.

Maybe an answer is to keep some structure but also give those managers some training in providing effective feedback - it is, arguably, the most important part of their job after all.

It was the companies who removed ratings and made the review process less formal that ran into trouble. When the process was stripped of all formality, managers just skipped it. Leaving employees in the dark about how they’re doing.

Related Articles

Confronting loneliness: our shared responsibility

Amanda Okill explores the growing concern of loneliness and ways to address it in the modern workplace.

The UK workplace culture war: How to bridge the gap in the EDI debate

How to bridge the gap in the EDI debate? Read our advice to business leaders who find themselves in the midst of this UK workplace culture war…

How to give constructive feedback (and how to receive it)

Discover best practice tips for giving constructive feedback from expert Amanda, plus ways to receive feedback that will help you learn and grow.
No items found.