Abolishing performance ratings not without risk

Published on
Written by
No items found.
Share

Here's some interesting research insight into the perils of abandoning performance ratings.

The thinking tends to be that imposing performance ratings will be counterproductive, reinforce stereotypes, encourage the idea that managers only have to have performance conversations once a year and that the annual performance appraisal system is so time consuming. The obvious answer, abandon it. Hmmm, seems that may not be the answer. Too often, and perhaps not surprisingly, the result is that, instead of encouraging a continuing discussion about performance, no discussion takes place at all or, if it does, the employee does not understand what s/he is being told.

Sadly, the report concludes, most managers are not skilled enough to deliver clear, meaningful messages, without some structure.

Maybe an answer is to keep some structure but also give those managers some training in providing effective feedback - it is, arguably, the most important part of their job after all.

It was the companies who removed ratings and made the review process less formal that ran into trouble. When the process was stripped of all formality, managers just skipped it. Leaving employees in the dark about how they’re doing.

Related Articles

Sexual harassment at work: what’s changing in 2026?

Cathy Oliver outlines how expectations on organisations will rise across legal, regulatory and cultural dimensions this year.

Creating psychological and challenger safety: a practical guide

Founder Matt Dean shares real, practical ways in which leaders can create genuine challenger safety in the workplace.

Alcohol at work events - getting the right balance of risk vs engagement

The way alcohol is perceived at work is changing, leaving HR teams questioning how they should structure work events and celebrations.