Abolishing performance ratings not without risk

Published on

Here's some interesting research insight into the perils of abandoning performance ratings.

The thinking tends to be that imposing performance ratings will be counterproductive, reinforce stereotypes, encourage the idea that managers only have to have performance conversations once a year and that the annual performance appraisal system is so time consuming. The obvious answer, abandon it. Hmmm, seems that may not be the answer. Too often, and perhaps not surprisingly, the result is that, instead of encouraging a continuing discussion about performance, no discussion takes place at all or, if it does, the employee does not understand what s/he is being told.

Sadly, the report concludes, most managers are not skilled enough to deliver clear, meaningful messages, without some structure.

Maybe an answer is to keep some structure but also give those managers some training in providing effective feedback - it is, arguably, the most important part of their job after all.

It was the companies who removed ratings and made the review process less formal that ran into trouble. When the process was stripped of all formality, managers just skipped it. Leaving employees in the dark about how they’re doing.

Related Articles

A different fork in the road at Twitter

On International Men’s Day I thought I might send a note to a man who I think is giving us a bit of a bad rep.

Parents, careers and gender equality : where we are, where we will be, how to get where we want to be

When it comes to work, employers need to do much more to help achieve gender equality at this crucial time when a couple starts a family.

Email best practice – a case study starring Suella Braverman

When work emails end up in the wrong place, Ajit Moorthy considers what questions should be posed before rushing to judgment.
No items found.