Abolishing performance ratings not without risk

Published on

Here's some interesting research insight into the perils of abandoning performance ratings.

The thinking tends to be that imposing performance ratings will be counterproductive, reinforce stereotypes, encourage the idea that managers only have to have performance conversations once a year and that the annual performance appraisal system is so time consuming. The obvious answer, abandon it. Hmmm, seems that may not be the answer. Too often, and perhaps not surprisingly, the result is that, instead of encouraging a continuing discussion about performance, no discussion takes place at all or, if it does, the employee does not understand what s/he is being told.

Sadly, the report concludes, most managers are not skilled enough to deliver clear, meaningful messages, without some structure.

Maybe an answer is to keep some structure but also give those managers some training in providing effective feedback - it is, arguably, the most important part of their job after all.

It was the companies who removed ratings and made the review process less formal that ran into trouble. When the process was stripped of all formality, managers just skipped it. Leaving employees in the dark about how they’re doing.

Related Articles

DEI is dead. Long live DEI!

DEI is under fire - again. But the best organisations cut through the noise, staying focused on fairness, talent, and success. Jane explores why the “DEI is dead” narrative keeps resurfacing - and why the real work continues.

Guest Q&A – Co Founder of speak up platform InChorus

Rosie Turner joins us to discuss what gets in the way of speaking up, and the problems this causes.

Sexual Harassment Roundup: Gregg Wallace, a Recent Tribunal, and Tackling the ‘Everyone Knows’ Predators in the Workplace

Sexual harassment has been at the forefront of our work, and we’ve applied our insights to some of the most talked-about stories.
No items found.